Works Cited Alsaif, Omar Abdulaziz. Shakespeare, William. The tragedy of Hamlet. University Press, Share this: Twitter Facebook. Like this: Like Loading Previous Previous post: Balancing the National Debt. An excellent post, congratulations!! Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:. Email required Address never made public. Name required. Follow Following. Sign me up. Already have a WordPress. Judging from the differences between the three men, it is obvious that they will each take different paths in dealing with the deaths of their fathers.
He is enraged that his father was not buried with his sword and that there was no memorial or tablet displaying their family coat of arms. He gives no thought to the damnation of his soul as he quickly makes a plan with Claudius to poison Hamlet. After the death of his father, Hamlet has no reason to point blame at anyone, as there is nothing to make him believe that his father was killed unjustly.
Unlike Laertes, Hamlet has deep consideration for his soul being damned on account of his actions to avenge his father. He condemns himself throughout the play for being a coward. Fortinbras acts the most rationally out of the three. He takes the time to establish an army and seek revenge upon the country of Denmark as a whole as it was in a war against the country that his father was killed.
He obeys showing that he can be dealt with sensibly and that he does not look so much to murder as the way to avenge his father as Hamlet and Laertes do. He does not act out of fits of temporary madness like Laertes and Hamlet, but stops to develop a plan and realizes the consequences of a victory or loss. He carried out his plan under the law without the risk of his soul being damned to hell. Even Hamlet saw him as a man of reason and a good leader as he bestowed the crown of Denmark upon him in the end.
His state of depression and madness throughout most of the play may not be understood, but it can be tolerated. But how can one say that they would be willing not to take out personal revenge and trust the system if they were not in the situation themselves? It is difficult to understand the actions of these three characters, as the audience cannot relate to what they are feeling after the deaths of their fathers.
The prince murders him, however he bears no responsibility for it.. The explanation is simple: Polonius has lower social position than Hamlet.
Another important fact is family bond. Although Claudius is a murderer, he still belongs to Hamlet's family; what is more, after marrying Gertrude , he becomes prince's stepfather. In this case Hamlet considers not only killing a man, but a man from his own family.
This makes him even more confused and uncertain of his deeds. Fear of society's reaction and reaction of his own mother has also influence on prince's actions. Next dilemma is a consequence of royal position. As a king, Claudius is accompanied by subordinates almost all the time, hence it would be hard for Hamlet to kill him without any witnesses.
Many people argue with this theory, for the reason that the prince had ideal situation to kill Claudius. Get Access. Read More. Hamlet and the Issue of Revenge in William Shakespeare's Play Words 7 Pages Hamlet and the Issue of Revenge in William Shakespeare's Play The question of why Hamlet does not immediately avenge his father's death is perhaps one of the most perplexing problems faced by an audience.
Popular Essays. Hamlet on the other hand has a very hasty and impulsive nature, but he learns to tame it as the book goes on. He starts off being a show off and following the ghost, then he learns about his fathers' murder which "drives him mad" or so everyone thinks he is for no defined reason , but he does not let these emotions control him completely be The morality of an issue worries Hamlet while Claudius has no appreciation for moral law.
Finally, Claudius does whatever it takes to get power, while Hamlet does the same type of things, although they are not right he feels bad about them and has moral conflicts unlike Claudius who murders without moral consent. Shakespeare wrote in characters like Claudius to help his audience understand more about the main character. At this stage Hamlet is suicidal and risks himself being estranged from his religious principals as he begins to think of suicide.
If Hamlet were to kill Claudius, he would be violating a central religious principle against murdering another human being. Personally I also have not been able to enjoy my life when I am unable to decide. When I am faced with a crisis, I do not think more about the relationship with others, but give more attention to solve the crisis in my view point which will not be proved as good solution which causes happiness.
This is the same thing that happened to Hamlet. Hamlet was so entrenched in his self remorse that he could not honour his father, and in doing so also neglected his responsibility towards Denmark and Gertrude. William Shakespeare attempted to show that suicide is not a noble act, but a selfish one that contradicts the purpose of life. Shakespeare implies that it is the easy way out of life, and that so called perpetual sleep might be a nightmare that is worse than life itself. Trust is defined as the reliance on the integrity, strength, ability or surety of a person or thing.
To break ones trust is to lose their confidence in the person or thing. Trust can be broken with a single, unreliable action and is often challenging and difficult to win back.
In the case of the one whose trust was broken, it is a difficult, jarring and abrupt change of reality to discover the betrayal and loss of trust in someone who they once relied upon.
0コメント